
一 | Pyongyang's assumptions with regard to Washington's potential role in the COVID-19 pandemic apparently stem from a bombshell report by professors Jeffrey D Sachs and Neil L Harrison, published in May 2022 by peer-reviewed multidisciplinary scientific journal, The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS).,"Prof Jeffrey Sachs of Columbia University had spent two years as chairman of the Lancet Commission on COVID and recently published a major paper in the prestigious PNAS journal arguing that the virus was very likely artificial, also calling for an independent inquiry into its possible American origins, but virtually all western media outlets ignored his dramatic reversal," says Ron Unz, an American technology entrepreneur, political activist, writer and the publisher of the Unz Review.,On 27 May, Sachs and Harrison released an op-ed for Project Syndicate, arguing that US authorities suppressed inquiries into the role US scientific research institutions may have played in creating the conditions of the COVID pandemic. "Yet if the coronavirus did indeed come from a lab, US culpability is almost certain," the professors insisted, calling for independent probes "not only into the outbreak in Wuhan, China, but also into the relevant US scientific research, international outreach, and technology licensing in the lead-up to the pandemic.",According to Sachs and Harrison, "the full story of the outbreak could involve America’s role in researching coronaviruses and in sharing its biotechnology with others around the world." The professors pointed out that "US scientists who work with SARS-like coronaviruses regularly create and test dangerous novel variants" to develop drugs and vaccines against them. These experiments, also known as "gain-of-function" research, have been conducted for decades prompting concerns that one day they could lead to an accidental outbreak or end up in the wrong hands, the scholars highlighted.,"In June, [Sachs] went even further in his public statements at a Spanish think-tank, describing the COVID virus as probably having an American origin," notes Unz. "In my opinion, Prof Sachs is merely stating what many senior figures in the West quietly believe or suspect but have been unwilling to mention publicly.",Situation in UkraineUS Has Helped Support 46 Biological Labs in Ukraine Over Last Two Decades, Pentagon Says9 June, 17:19 GMT,An Accidental Leak or a Warfare Tool?,America's experiments with viruses and dangerous pathogens have triggered concerns in Russia and China over the past few years. On 13 May 2020, Russia's Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergei Lavrov drew attention to a "dense network" of US biolabs located "along the perimeter of the Russian Federation and near Chinese borders".,Earlier this year, Beijing urged Washington to disclose the information about the activities of at least 360 biolabs in the world, presumably run by the US.,Since 2001, Russia, China, and many other countries have advocated the creation of a verification mechanism within the framework of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction to ensure biosafety across the world. Nonetheless, the US was "about the only country" which has categorically opposed this proposal for roughly 20 years, Lavrov revealed in 2020.,"Over the past 70 years, America has invested an estimated $100Bln in developing the world's largest and longest-standing biowarfare program," says Unz.,Situation in UkraineWhat's Behind Washington's Denial of Biowarfare Weapons Programme in Ukraine?12 March, 15:50 GMT,The American publisher suggested that the US could be responsible for the COVID outbreak long before Sachs and Harrison did. Furthermore, Unz does not rule out that the pathogen was used as a deliberate biowarfare tool against China and, possibly, Iran by "elements of [the US] national security establishment, though without the direct knowledge or authorization of President Donald Trump.",There are a lot of unknowns about the mysterious pandemic which is believed to have come from the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan, China. For instance, neither a COVID-19 "patient zero" nor a "guilty bat" have been found, which means that SARS-CoV-2 may actually have been circulating among humans some time before the late 2019 Wuhan outbreak, according to CBS News.,In April 2020, ABC News broke the story that a special medical intelligence unit within the US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) in the second week of November 2019 produced a classified report warning about an "out-of-control disease epidemic" in the Wuhan area of China. It urged the US to protect its forces in Asia. Although a Pentagon spokesman officially denied the existence of that November report, Israel's broadcaster Channel 12 said the US had also shared the document in question with NATO and Israeli Defense Force (IDF).,It appears suspicious, according to Unz, that the DIA rushed to dub the mysterious disease an "epidemic" at a time when just a couple of dozen individuals were infected in Wuhan.,"It therefore appears that elements of the Defense Intelligence Agency were aware of the deadly viral outbreak in Wuhan more than a month before any officials in the Chinese government itself," Unz points out. "Furthermore, the New York Times and CNN have also promoted a major new research study just published in Science that found the first Wuhan infection probably occurred on 18 November 2019. This was after the secret DIA report had already been produced, but the American media has completely ignored the implications of this striking discrepancy.",Yet another strange coincidence was Donald Trump's appointment of Robert Kadlec as the top official for dealing with biological threats in 2017, the American writer says. Since the Nineties, Kadlec had been one of America’s leading biowarfare advocates.,"From January to August 2019, Kadlec’s department ran the 'Crimson Contagion' simulation exercise, involving the hypothetical outbreak of a dangerous respiratory viral disease in China, which eventually spreads to the United States, with the participants focusing on the necessary measures to control it in this country," Unz says, adding that before that China had suffered two inexplicable viral epidemics which hit its poultry and pork industry in 2018 and 2019, respectively.,Situation in UkraineUkraine Labs: Bioweapons Can be Used as Tool in US Low-Level War Against Russia, ex-DoD Analyst Says15 April, 12:51 GMT,History of Pentagon's Bio-warfare,Although the Pentagon's alleged responsibility for the COVID outbreak has yet to be examined and backed by solid evidence, one must admit that Washington is no novice where biological warfare is concerened.,The US was accused of using germ weapons against Korea during the Korean War (1950-1953) and China based on the testimony of at least 38 US military pilots.,In August 2021, Xinhua quoted witnesses and historians describing how the Pentagon used germ bombs in civilian areas in China and Korea to spread dozens of species of poisonous insects and germs.,And Havana leveled accusations against the Pentagon over the dengue epidemic in Cuba that contaminated 345,000 people in 1981 and an artificial outbreak of African swine fever (ASF) that led to the slaughter of 500,000 animals and inflicted considerable economic damage on the island nation in 1971. The US Department of Defense denied the allegations.,"Over the years highly regarded and fully mainstream American journalists and academics have published books and articles documenting America's extensive use of biowarfare during the Korean War and later as anti-food supply attacks against Cuba, East Germany, and other countries," notes Unz.,Recently, Russia's Ministry of Defense has revisited cases pertaining to the US history of biological warfare, while examining a trove of highly sensitive documents shedding light on the Pentagon's experiments with highly contagious pathogens in Ukraine. According to the MoD, the Pentagon's Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) division ran a network of biological labs in Ukraine with the aim of inflicting damage on Russia's people and economy.,"I'm certainly aware of the Russian Ministry of Defense public claims regarding the Pentagon's involvement in Ukrainian biolabs, and the preparation of possible biowarfare attacks against Russia," says Unz. "I don't have any special knowledge of this issue, but the apparent public admission by [Undersecretary of State] Victoria Nuland at a US Senate hearing convinced me that there was a high likelihood that these Russian accusations were correct.",Unz argues that "American military plans for biowarfare attacks against Russia dramatically increase the likelihood that similar measures had been prepared against China and Iran, and perhaps actually carried out by rogue elements of the Trump Administration." Although US secretive biological programs and the Pentagon's overseas biowarfare labs have been triggering further suspicions, the topic still remains largely neglected and suppressed by western mainstream media.。 近日,记者调查发现,部分黄金首饰直播间以“足金999”“新人礼”“福利”为引流噱头,以“秒拍秒付”“只上车3秒”“10秒付款时间”等话术催单,却在消费者抢购时修改商品详情,将商品链接进行掉包——直播间展示的是足金首饰,消费者收到的却是合金制品。部分涉事商家已被列入经营异常名录,消费者维权难度倍增。“新人见面礼”虚假引流 8月21日晚,记者在“可爱多”直播间看到,主播正在展示一款黄金戒指,戒指背后的纸板用大字标注“足金999 新人见面礼”,直播间背景显示“深圳水贝”字样。

二 | 主播宣称:“新账号刚开播,把这款戒指拿出来,先让大家感受一下品质。不是镀金、沙金、铼金,更不是金包银。”随后主播展示戒指内圈钢印,“足金999”清晰可见,并强调“看这里,一个足一个金,含纯量3个9”。 针对网友询问戒指是否为空心,主播将戒指放上电子秤,显示重量为5克,并表示“5克重量,实心的,足金戒指,带钢印”。直播间界面弹出提示信息“计价方式:一口价;发货时间:48小时”,界面下方提示“讲解中,已抢光,足金999传承”。 记者发现,直播间小黄车置顶商品名称为“【足金999】传承光面时尚百搭戒指”,材质标注“足金,金材质含量≥999‰”,标价每件19.9元,关联网店名称为“清禾世界”。该店铺其他上架商品为黄金首饰,均标注“足金”,单件售价3万元至5万元不等。 链接上架前,主播承诺为直播间下单用户送包装礼盒。随着页面切换,主播手中的样品也悄然更换,造型、颜色相似的戒指被放在一个包装礼盒里。随后主播再次强调:“咱家这戒指是真的,全部带标带码带钢印。不管价格再便宜,一定是专柜正品,从专柜发出,保真。”“我敢说这个素圈一定是真的,假的是无法发货的,会被拦截。你收到的和我手上展示的素圈,材质、颜色、款式全都一模一样。

三 | ”记者注意到,主播在讲解中已将此前宣传的戒指改称为素圈。 链接上架后,主播称只有10秒付款时间,超时无法下单,要拼手速。记者查看发现,置顶商品链接已变为“【粉丝福利】传承光面时尚百搭素圈”,材质标注变为“铜合金,外观金色,无镀层”,售价仍为每件19.9元,网店名称未变。记者经查询了解到,“清禾世界”经营主体为山东省高唐县吉盛春百货店(个体工商户)。天眼查数据显示,该店2025年12月注册成立,今年7月6日因未按照《个体工商户年度报告办法》规定报送年度报告,被高唐县市场监管局列入经营异常名录。 同样的套路在“吴起商贸-承运兰”直播间上演。

四 | 主播展示一款带有“足金999”钢印的戒指,宣称“新号开播,带钢带印,两张红票都不到”。记者看到,小黄车1号链接标注“【足金999】经典古法沙面泥丘背圆环结婚礼物足金配件”,材质为“足金”,标价为每件138元。

五 | 链接上架时,标价不变,但商品名称变为“【七夕返场】时尚百搭泥鳅背经典轻奢精品圆环婚庆首饰”,材质一栏也变为空白。与此同时,关联网店从“瑞泽霖源”变为“水贝王总金展店”。

六 | “水贝王总金展店”经营主体为陕西省西安市未央区铭钰桶装水店,经营范围为食品销售和新鲜水果零售,已被列入经营异常名录。假证书充当“定心丸” 在“福气东来”直播间,主播展示了3件同款黄金手镯,并指着手镯上的“足金999”钢印称:“带标带码,票据证书齐全,专柜怎么卖我们怎么发。” 随后,主播拿出证书进行展示。记者从屏幕上只能看到大半张证书,上面标注“检测结论:足金;含金量≥999‰”“鉴定者陈明娟”,公章显示为“中金国银珠宝检测中心珠宝玉石鉴定”。

七 | 然而,记者查询并未发现名称为“中金国银珠宝检测中心”的经营主体,名称相似的有深圳中金国银珠宝检测有限公司,后者曾在公司官网首页发布《关于网上流传的编号为W61241255234的证书,不是本公司出具的检测证书,为假冒证书!》,公告下方提供了假冒证书样本,并特别指出假冒证书上“鉴定者陈明娟”、证书检验编号、CMA认证编号等5处内容及标识存在造假问题。 直播过程中,手镯称重显示为49.2克,主播宣称“不是沙金,不是镀的铑的K的,更不是金包银”,并承诺“货不对板,支持仅退款”,同时宣称“一个城市一个名额”,要求观众登记所在城市名称。 主播讲解期间,直播间页面闪现“计价方式一口价”“足金999粉丝专享 先鉴后发 运费险”,小黄车商品名称显示为“【足金999粉丝专享】古法传承5G宽版轮胎开口磨砂黄金手镯”,产品参数标注“足金金材质含量≥999‰”,标价为每件299元。 记者比对发现,主播直播展示的手镯与页面闪现的手镯造型有所不同,前者无开口,后者有开口。点击小黄车的商品链接,显示只能预约,不能购买。同时页面显示“开售提醒”“已预约1715人”“定时开售”字样,对应网店为“蔷薇私语美学”,经营主体为杭州梵初网络科技有限公司。 “抢购通道已打开”“10秒付款时间”“秒拍秒付”……当主播告知链接上架时,记者注意到小黄车商品名称变为“手镯【粉丝专享】新中式古法传承首饰心经气质百搭实心卡8XI”,标价仍为每件299元,但材质为“合金”,关联网店变为“周瑞金珠宝”。

八 | 经查,该网店经营主体为哈尔滨市松北区托霖森百货行(个体工商户),今年6月9日注册成立。 同样的套路在“满目金光”直播间上演。该直播间同样以“蔷薇私语美学”的开口磨砂黄金手镯进行引流,实际出售的是“周瑞金珠宝”的合金手镯。

九 | “足金”实为铜合金 8月24日,记者收到从“可爱多”直播间购买的“新人见面礼戒指”,包装内既无产品合格证书、贵金属检测鉴定证书,也无厂名厂址,金黄色戒指内圈仅有“999”钢印,与直播间展示的“足金999”描述不符。 记者将戒指送往位于福州特艺城的魅奇金业检测室进行光谱分析检测。结果显示,该戒指材质为铜合金,克重2克,主要成分及含量为:铜约72.71%、镍约18.35%、锌约6.98%,另含微量钯等其他金属元素。检测人员表示,目前每克铜的成本价为0.1元左右。该铜合金戒指表面无镀层保护,长期佩戴易加速腐蚀和氧化,其中含有的镍、铂等金属成分可能引发皮肤过敏反应。 针对部分低价合金饰品可能存在材质虚标等问题,安徽省市场监管局曾提醒消费者购买合金饰品要警惕低价陷阱,仔细核对产品标签或详情页,务必确认商品有明确的材质说明,具备符合国家或国际安全标准的检测认证,如《饰品有害元素限量的规定》(GB 28480—2012)。若金属首饰价格远低于市场合理水平,大概率为劣质产品。消费者应优先选择正规商场、品牌专柜购买,要求商家提供材质检测报告,规避“三无”产品;警惕标注“镀镍”镀铬”的合金首饰,以及模糊标注“沙金”“古法仿金”的产品。(记者 张文章)。
Current article:http://ow60td.diaoengngtengdiachanpiezao.sbs/edmki7/p4k1wi.html
Published on:05:31:12